|
|||||
FEATURED TOPICDigital Transition -The term "Digital Transition" describes the process all organizations must go through in the 21st Century, as they leverage new technologies that provide new options for Applications, Equipment, Processes, and Networks that make them more effective. In contrast, the term "Municipal Wireless" is limiting. It puts the network technology ahead of the application and process changes that drive the business case. ORIENTATION |
« Digital Cities: Houston Mayor White Speech | Weblog | Digital Cities: National League of Cities » Digital Cities: Service Provider PerspectiveYesterday, we had a good discussion at the Digital Cities Service Provider Executive Roundtable, which was hosted by Yankee Group, rClient and W2i, and facilitated by Berge Ayvazian (Chief Research Officer, Yankee Group). This special seminar and roundtable (by invitation only) drew on the Yankee Group's extensive research on service-provider strategies for municipal and metropolitan broadband-wireless networks. It provided a forum for service providers to discuss business and market strategies and examine the potential for cooperation among emerging broadband-wireless service providers and existing cable, telco, cellular, and Internet service providers. As an experiment, it worked. Berge asked for volunteers to present the findings and provide a perspective on the "Service Provider Diliemma." Here's a scoop on my opinions in advance of the panel. First and foremost, I'd define the Service Provider Dilemma as follows: the industry, for all of its progress, is still in its infancy and to many observers, from large incumbents to enterprise service providers to city government officials, still in a Proof of Concept stage. No clear business models are yet proven out with quantifiable case studies. We're starting to see that, but frankly, until we start analysing some of the largest deployments, we won't have the hard data to communicate with skeptics. Who's going to do the proving? That's the service provider dilemma - to build these networks in a speculative fashion is a risk that not many are not yet prepared to make. So, despite the incredible value that these new technologies provide, we have a plethora of small scale deployments - we're just starting to see large deployments mature, such as Corpus Christi and Tempe. We're still in the experimentation stage, and that's frustrating for big service providers, who need to see a clear road to the ROI before their executives will commit resources to this space. Smaller innovators can take more risks, but they lack the deep resources of the big guys. I believe that that puts a premium on all of us to help each other where we can. Can we focus on 1) learning and education; 2) on experimentation, trials and proofs of concept and pilots, and 3) collaboration, both Private/Private, Public/Private and geographic among regions? We'll see. If and its a big if because many are not ready to go there, but if we're able to work together in some coordinated fashion, we can get to our mutual goals sooner. So my dream is that we see ourselves reaching our goals sooner than we thought because we find safe ways to work together and collaborate to collapse cycle times and learn more efficiently. I saw yesterday that there is significant interest to focus on common areas, such as customer service,, that we all can agree on and go from there. I'd urge you public sector guys to challenge yourselves in similar fashion, to identify what you can do to help each other. Posted on March 01, 2006 at 02:29 PM CommentsPost a comment |
METRONET VENDOR DIRECTORYMY OTHER BLOGSMetroNetIQ E-Store - Be sure to visit the MetroNetIQ E-Store and pick up a copy of The ABCs of Community Broadband: How Digital Transitions Will Transform America's Communities, One at a Time. The E-Store will offer special discounts on this valuable guide for community leaders, discounts that won't be available to the general public on Amazon! |
|||
| Powered by Movable Type | ©2006 MetroNetIQ.com | Website Design by zilkoweb | |||