|
|||||
FEATURED TOPICDigital Transition -The term "Digital Transition" describes the process all organizations must go through in the 21st Century, as they leverage new technologies that provide new options for Applications, Equipment, Processes, and Networks that make them more effective. In contrast, the term "Municipal Wireless" is limiting. It puts the network technology ahead of the application and process changes that drive the business case. ORIENTATION |
« How To Unwire, Part III | Weblog | Texas: Addison Teams with RedMoon BB » When in Doubt, Farm it OutMost cities are now going the general contractor route, either because the technology seems so complex, or to avoid any political embarrassments from some misstep. from The Seattle Times: Opinion: City-sponsored Wi-Fi's wild ride, by Neal Pierce, Syndicated columnist With apologies for this blog title to the late Johnnie Cochran, it helps to make a point with rhyme. As this article makes clear, city leaders increasingly look to the private sector to help them get broadband, but not necessarily to the traditional sources of help on telecom issues. Cable and Telecom incumbents have squandered their logical leadership position and cities are turning to upstart competitors to help them put city networks in place. Most city leaders do not want the political risk that would go with running the network themselves. But that doesn't stop incumbent-sponsored groups like the Heartland Institute from beating the drum about the risks associated with municipally-owned broadband (see The Heartland Institute - A Mixed Month for Muni Broadband - by Steven Titch. The facts are, articles like this tend to use a single example that contradicts the mainstream evidence to make their points, and invariably, the examples of poor performance by city-owned projects are dated fiber projects, not timely wireless examples. And in any case, the authors are singing a song that is increasingly irrelevant, as cities mostly work in partnership with private sector firms to hasten the penetration of broadband. It will be a while until a federal telecom bill makes it through the grinding legislative process at the Capitol, so while the McCain Lautenberg bill offers hope of federal intervention to stop state legislatures from tying the hands of municipalities, it can be expected that more initiatives by incumbents will rear their heads in state capitals in the months ahead. Those cities that move diligently to acquire the skills and recruit the private sector partners will be winners if they get networks in place before their state leaders heed the incumbents' siren song of state-provided protection of large corporations from competition by municipalities, when in reality they are protecting large companies from competition with small private companies who seek to meet city needs. UnwireMyCity.com encourages its readers to get educated, get busy, and make something happen. The opportunity costs of going without broadband are much more likely to be higher than the risks of moving ahead today, with technologies like wireless mesh that let a city dip its toe in the water, learn, and adjust its plans to provide the most benefit with the least risk. There is no reason to wait, and there is no reason to fear. The biggest risk today is in delaying development and implementation of an infrastructure plan, which will leave your city behind in the new global marketplace, and perhaps out of luck if your state lawmakers decide to take your authority away. Posted on August 24, 2005 at 09:43 AM CommentsPost a comment |
METRONET VENDOR DIRECTORYMY OTHER BLOGSMetroNetIQ E-Store - Be sure to visit the MetroNetIQ E-Store and pick up a copy of The ABCs of Community Broadband: How Digital Transitions Will Transform America's Communities, One at a Time. The E-Store will offer special discounts on this valuable guide for community leaders, discounts that won't be available to the general public on Amazon! |
|||
| Powered by Movable Type | ©2006 MetroNetIQ.com | Website Design by zilkoweb | |||